MAA · Company KPIs
MAA (MAA) KPIs
Same Store Average Effective Rent per Unit, Same Store Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth, Resident Turnover. As reported in SEC filings, with the source line for each figure.
Same Store Average Effective Rent per Unit
$1,691 for the period ended Sep 30, 2026
The company’s definition: Average Effective Rent per Unit represents the average of gross rent amounts after the effect of leasing concessions for occupied units plus prevalent market rates asked for unoccupied units, divided by the total number of units.
Source
| Period ended | Figure | Filing text |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | $1,691 | Same Store Operating Statistics · $1,691 · 95.3% · $1,688 · 95.4% · 39.6%8-K filed 2026-10-28 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | $1,688 | Total Same Store · 96,561 · $517,438 · $519,039 · (0.3)% · $201,219 · $199,537 · 0.8% · $316,219 · $319,502 · (1.0)% · $1,688 · $1,691 · (0.2)%8-K filed 2026-07-29 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | $1,685 | Same Store Operating Statistics · $1,685 · 95.5% · 39.9%8-K filed 2026-04-29 |
| Sep 30, 2025 | $1,693 | Same Store Operating Statistics · $1,693 · 95.6% · $1,691 · 95.5% · 40.2%8-K filed 2025-10-29 |
| Mar 31, 2025 | $1,690 | Total Same Store · 96,561 · $516,980 · $518,827 · (0.4)% · $188,284 · $185,911 · 1.3% · $328,696 · $332,916 · (1.3)% · $1,685 · $1,690 · (0.3)%8-K filed 2026-04-29 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | $1,692 | Total Same Store · 96,568 · $518,521 · $518,796 · (0.1)% · $188,692 · $187,470 · 0.7% · $329,829 · $331,326 · (0.5)% · $1,687 · $1,692 · (0.3)%8-K filed 2026-02-04 |
| Sep 30, 2024 | $1,700 | Total Same Store · 96,568 · $520,861 · $522,278 · (0.3)% · $198,833 · $194,372 · 2.3% · $322,028 · $327,906 · (1.8)% · $1,693 · $1,700 · (0.4)%8-K filed 2025-10-29 |
Same Store Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth
0.4% for the period ended Sep 30, 2026
The company’s definition: Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth represents the combined weighted average of Effective New Lease Rate Growth and Effective Renewal Lease Rate Growth from our Same Store Portfolio for the applicable period.
Source
| Period ended | Figure | Filing text |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | 0.4% | Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth · 0.4% · 0.4%8-K filed 2026-10-28 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | 0.7% | Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth · 0.7% · 0.3%8-K filed 2026-07-29 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | -0.3% | Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth · -0.3%8-K filed 2026-04-29 |
| Dec 31, 2025 | -1.7% | Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth · -1.7% · -0.1%8-K filed 2026-02-04 |
| Sep 30, 2025 | 0.3% | Effective Blended Lease Rate Growth · 0.3% · 0.2%8-K filed 2025-10-29 |
Resident Turnover
39.6% at Sep 30, 2026
The company’s definition: Resident turnover represents resident move outs excluding transfers within the Same Store Portfolio as a percentage of expiring leases on a trailing twelve month basis as of the end of the reported quarter.
Source
| Period ended | Figure | Filing text |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | 39.6% | Same Store Operating Statistics · $1,691 · 95.3% · $1,688 · 95.4% · 39.6%8-K filed 2026-10-28 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | 39.6% | As of June 30, 2026, resident turnover in the Same Store Portfolio remained historically low at 39.6% with a low level of move-outs associated with buying single-family homes of 10.9% for the quarter.8-K filed 2026-07-29 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | 39.9% | As of March 31, 2026, resident turnover in the Same Store Portfolio remained historically low at 39.9% with a low level of move-outs associated with buying single-family homes of 11.1% for the quarter.8-K filed 2026-04-29 |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 40.2% | As of December 31, 2025, resident turnover in the Same Store Portfolio remained historically low at 40.2% with a low level of move-outs associated with buying single-family homes of 11.1% for the year.8-K filed 2026-02-04 |
| Sep 30, 2025 | 40.2% | Same Store Operating Statistics · $1,693 · 95.6% · $1,691 · 95.5% · 40.2%8-K filed 2025-10-29 |
| Jun 30, 2025 | 41% | As of June 30, 2026, resident turnover for our Same Store segment was 39.6% as compared to 41.0% as of June 30, 2025.10-Q filed 2026-07-30 |
Reading notes
Figures are shown as first reported. If a later filing prints a different figure for the same period, both appear. A figure marked ≈ or shown in words is how the company itself states it, not an estimate of ours. Companies change definitions over time, so compare periods with the quoted definition in mind. Periods that failed our checks are left out, so gaps are expected.